Thanks to Noel for appending "_gnu++0x" to the Sandia-gcc test names to indicate that the compiler is running with the option that enables C++0x features. For example, "gcc- 4.4.1_gnu++0x".

I find this really helpful, and hope that other testers will also indicate C++0x features are enabled if the compiler requires a specific option to enable them.

However, could we agree on a shorter naming convention? Screen width is scarce on the regression reporting pages. See http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html

Perhaps just "-0x" as in "gcc- 4.4.1-0x"?

Thanks,

--Beman