I run all my tests with the --incremental flag, could this be causing what you're seeing?�<br><br>Another potential issue, I'm bjam seems to be crashing part way through each run. I've been meaning to do some digging into this, but haven't had the opportunity. �It crashes after msvc-11.0's pool test running valgrind (this test fails, but I think it is whatever is *next* that is causing the crash). Here's my whole bjam.log file if anyone is interested (8MB compressed):�<a href="http://boost.teeks99.com/temp/bjam.log.zip">http://boost.teeks99.com/temp/bjam.log.zip</a><div> <br></div><div>Tom<br> <br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM, John Maddock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:boost.regex@virgin.net" target="_blank">boost.regex@virgin.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm mainly looking at teeks99-1a-win7-32on64, but this seems to be an issue with other Win32 testers as well, there's a failure here:<br> <br> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/c4hwqqe" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/c4hwqqe</a><br> <br> Which shows failures in test_arithmetic.cpp.<br> <br> Now here's the thing, not only do I believe that bug has long since been fixed, but that file no longer exists in the repository as of rev #81654. There is a new test of the same name, but since the filenames all changed when I refactored the code I know there's something wrong here. �So while the tester appears to be testing rev #82100 I don't believe that to be the case. �BTW the Linux tests are cycling OK, and I see my changes taking effect there, but not on any of the Win32 tests.<br> <br> Anyone any ideas here?<br> <br> Many thanks, John. <br> </blockquote></div><br> </div>