I run all my tests with the --incremental flag, could this be causing what you&#39;re seeing? <br><br>Another potential issue, I&#39;m bjam seems to be crashing part way through each run. I&#39;ve been meaning to do some digging into this, but haven&#39;t had the opportunity.  It crashes after msvc-11.0&#39;s pool test running valgrind (this test fails, but I think it is whatever is *next* that is causing the crash). Here&#39;s my whole bjam.log file if anyone is interested (8MB compressed): <a href="http://boost.teeks99.com/temp/bjam.log.zip">http://boost.teeks99.com/temp/bjam.log.zip</a><div>

<br></div><div>Tom<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:44 PM, John Maddock <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:boost.regex@virgin.net" target="_blank">boost.regex@virgin.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I&#39;m mainly looking at teeks99-1a-win7-32on64, but this seems to be an issue with other Win32 testers as well, there&#39;s a failure here:<br>




<br>
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/c4hwqqe" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/c4hwqqe</a><br>
<br>
Which shows failures in test_arithmetic.cpp.<br>
<br>
Now here&#39;s the thing, not only do I believe that bug has long since been fixed, but that file no longer exists in the repository as of rev #81654. There is a new test of the same name, but since the filenames all changed when I refactored the code I know there&#39;s something wrong here.  So while the tester appears to be testing rev #82100 I don&#39;t believe that to be the case.  BTW the Linux tests are cycling OK, and I see my changes taking effect there, but not on any of the Win32 tests.<br>




<br>
Anyone any ideas here?<br>
<br>
Many thanks, John. <br>
</blockquote></div><br>
</div>