On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Tom Kent <lists@teeks99.com> wrote:

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:16 PM, John Maddock via Boost-Testing <boost-testing@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Nearly all the Teeks clang tests are in C++98 mode in-spite of their names, for example http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/teeks99-02-dc3-5-14-Docker-64on64-boost-bin-v2-libs-config-test-config_test-test-clang-linux-3-5~c++14-debug.html is listed as "C++14" but is actually C++98 (check the __cpluplus version). Which means the tests all sort of duplicate each other :(

The change seems to have applied, the result page you referenced is now different:
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/teeks99-02-dc3-5-14-Docker-64on64-boost-bin-v2-libs-config-test-config_test-test-clang-linux-3-5~c++14-debug.html

Does that look like you'd expect? Is the error expected?

It looks like that gets error is related to a pre-c++11 version of libstdc++ installed on the VM. I've attempted to update that teeks99-02-dc3.5-14 runner with a new version, we'll see how it goes.

That raises the bigger issue of libstdc++ vs libc++ (or libstdcxx, STLport, etc). I'm thinking that maybe the clang instanced (>=3.5) should be switched to libc++? Any thoughts? Maybe a question for the developers list?

Tom