Re: [Boost-users] ublas compatible solvers (newbie question) (Zrubavel Zodikovich)

From: Lorenzo Bolla (bolla_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-09 03:40:06

Have anyone ever thought about implementing bindings for the PETSc
library? To me, PETSc (http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-2/) seems
to be the best numeric library so far.
Cheers,
Lorenzo.

On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 00:30, ajb_at_[hidden] wrote:
> G'day all.
> 
> Daniel L Elliott wrote:
> 
> > I know of no such solvers in or out of uBLAS so I am not of much help.
> > However, you may want to consider interfacing uBLAS with libraries which
> > are not compatable with uBLAS.  You will find such interfaces in the
> > BOOST-sandbox CVS.  I may be undertaking a similar exercise between uBLAS
> > and some sparse system solvers.
> 
> Interesting.  Do you have any specific ones in mind?  I took a look
> at LASPACK, but unfortunately it doesn't appear to use BLAS.
> 
> Obviously, not reinventing the wheel would be best.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andrew Bromage
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>