Boost Users :
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 09:02:23
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | > Can you confirm that this would remove the present problems with gcc?
> | I seriously doubt it. The problem is that GCC looks up all names the
> | same way, even if they're not functions. The only cure is for clients
> | to isolate types from one another in separate sub-namespaces, and
> but we will have boost::end() and boost::mpl::end<>. Shouldn't that be enough?
> The problem before was unqualified calls to end() as I understood it. That
> will not
> be needed for ADL to kick in anymore.
Weren't you going to have boost::end() find the user's end via ADL?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net