Boost Users :
From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-15 15:23:32
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > If that is true then why do they pass the test???
> > ptr_release.html)
> a) I don't see any tests of scoped_ptr there.
it is part of smart_ptr_test.cpp.
> b) If I recall correctly, the borland version of scoped_ptr fails when the
> type is incomplete - which makes it not useful for implementing the PIMPL
it always fails unless the destructor is included first in the cpp file
> c) I was reluctant to include the whole smart_ptr machinery for just this
> one case.
> I am surprised that the delete in the destructor fails to delete the
> I've been unable to find the place where a constructor throws.
ok ... maybe the hypothesis can be checked by Jeff on a compiler
where scoped_ptr does work?
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net