Re: [Boost-users] [program_options] patch - optional argument support (gnu getopt_long style)

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-07 14:12:44

Steven Mackenzie wrote:

> Very useful to me, thanks!
> 
> I'm guessing that the implicit_value is distinct from the default_value,
> so that the default can be set seperately if the option is completely
> absent from the command line?

Heh, that's what I referred to in some previous discussion -- we kinda
have *two* different default values, which can be confusing.

- Volodya