|
Boost Users : |
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-31 23:00:26
AMDG
Joel Falcou wrote:
> I'll take this opportunity to ask the follwoing : would be a properly
> designed complex class be considered as a potential inclusion to boost
> (along octonion adn quaternion) ? In everyday life, using std::complex
> is sometimes cumbersome as some basic operations or conevrtion are lacking
What exactly is missing? Is there any particular reason it can't be
added as free functions?
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net