Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Test] Looking for Workaround: Subprocesses exiting with 0 reported as fatal error

From: Peter Klotz (Peter.Klotz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 03:35:50

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-users-
> bounces_at_[hidden]]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juni 2008 19:35
> An: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Betreff: Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Test] Looking for Workaround:
> Subprocesses exiting with 0 reported as fatal error
>
> Jens Seidel <jensseidel <at> users.sf.net> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:09:36AM +0000, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > > Florian Winter <fw <at> motama.com> writes:
> > > > In case we have to upgrade to the SVN version of Boost, is there a
> > > > recent SVN revision or tag that you would consider stable and
> recommend
> > > > for use?
> > >
> > > There were very minimal bug fixes only (including one above). You
> should
> not
> > > have any problems upgrading to the svn version
> >
> > Is there any reason why you don't comment this in the bug report?
> > Currently it looks like you never dealed with this bug. There is no
> > comment in it, no reference to a revision which fixes it, no patch ...
>
> Not sure I understood you completely, but if you mean I should have closed
> bug
> report - I thought I did. If not I'll do.

This bug does not seem to be fixed in Boost 1.36.0. I still obtain errors when child processes exit with return code 0.

Using the test code in trac ticket #1723 (http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1723):

Test setup error: child has exited; pid: 503; uid: 26975; exit value: 0

Regards, Peter.