Boost Users :
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-21 08:30:48
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:06, Sachin Garg <schngrg_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> While i++ works, i+7 doesn't works as basic_path::iterator does not
> implements advance(). Is there some specific reason for not having it?
I suspect it's simply that it wasn't included in the TR proposal,
wanting to leave open different options for implementations.
I have a feature request for an "uncomplete" function in; Would you be
happy with something like this instead?
complete( uncomplete(i, input_base_path), output_path);
Where input_base_path would be the first 7 components of your
input_path. (I'm guessing that the 7 comes from some other path,
rather than being hard-coded somehow.)
Hoping to find a new use case,
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net