Re: [Boost-users] Building boost_1.34.1 on mac os X 10.5 64 bit.

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost_1.34.1 on mac os X 10.5 64 bit.
From: Alexander Sack (pisymbol_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 21:54:56

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Alain Leblanc <aalebl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Alexander Sack <pisymbol_at_[hidden]>:
>
>>> Do you mean combined instead of x86? Using combined as a value for
>>> either the address model or the architecture returns a message
>>> indicating that it is not a valid value.
>>
>> Well I haven't done combined but what about 64 for address-model?
>>
>> -aps
>
>
> Same result.  With
>
> ./tools/jam/src/bin.macosxx86/bjam  architecture=x86
> address-model=combined install
>
> produces
>
> ...
>
> error: "combined" is not a known value of feature <address-model>
> error: legal values: "16" "32" "64"
>
> ...
>
> and the same result with adding --toolset-darwin to the command line.

Yes but if you do address-model=64, does that work?  I would assume
so.  I don't think "combined" is going to work.

-aps