Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess shared memory performance

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess shared memory performance
From: Lothar Werzinger (lothar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-22 16:31:58

On Sunday 28 December 2008, Andy Wiese wrote:
> Yep. Eventually FastCGI will be the way to go for the CGI
> implementation. In the current case, one target platform is a small
> embedded webserver that isn't FastCGI enabled, but I may be able to
> upgrade to Lighty or something in the future. However, I would also
> like to use the same library in other processes, to access the same
> data, and these processes are short lived similar to old-school CGI.
> So, my hope is to make a good-enough implementation for the one-shot
> scenario, and then use something like FastCGI where that is possible.

Did you consider creating a server process that holds the indexes and just 
open a pipe or socket to the server from your cgi processes to execute the 
query?

Lothar
-- 
Lothar Werzinger Dipl.-Ing. Univ.
framework & platform architect
Tradescape Inc. - Enabling Efficient Digital Marketplaces
1754 Technology Drive, Suite 128
San Jose, CA 95110
web: http://www.tradescape.biz