Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: [Boost-users] scoped_ptr::release (again)
From: Yang Zhang (yanghatespam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-20 13:27:47


 From http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_36_0/libs/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.htm:

"If scoped_ptr had a release() member, it would become possible to
transfer ownership of the held pointer, weakening its role as a way of
limiting resource lifetime to a given context. Use std::auto_ptr where
transfer of ownership is required. (supplied by Dave Abrahams)"

But there already is a way to escape the scope, via swap().

Would it make more sense to just provide release() and have users
specify const if they want? (const scoped_ptr/scoped_array would
effectively disallow swapping/releasing.)

-- 
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net