|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Pool ordered_malloc and O(n)
From: Georg Sauthoff (g_sauthoff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:09:01
On 2009-02-20, Raindog <raindog_at_[hidden]> wrote:
Hi,
> Georg Sauthoff wrote:
[..]
>> (I terminated the program). Profiling it, one can see, that
>> ordered_malloc dominates the runtime (83 % after a few minutes).
>> Is this a known issue? Is the runtime of ordered_malloc in O(n), i.e. in
>> O(c\cdot n), but the constant factor c is very huge?
> Are you using Visual C++? You might have to disable its checked
> iterators if so.
No, I am using GCC 4.3.2 under Ubuntu.
Best regards
Georg Sauthoff
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net