Re: [Boost-users] PropertyTree's XML parsers survey

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] PropertyTree's XML parsers survey
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-18 10:39:07

Nat Goodspeed wrote:
>
> Instead of incrementally enhancing a minimal XML parser, wouldn't it
> make more sense to jump right to an existing full-blown parser
> implementation?
In the case of Serialization, that adds a Boost-external dependency. In
the case of PropertyTree, this adds a compile-time dependency to a
header-only library. Unless that parser is pugxml, but I don't really
trust it.

Sebastian