Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-21 09:06:47

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 21 May 2010, Neil Groves wrote:
> Sadly I'm still having errors with my version on GCC 4.4 despite having
> fixed the aliasing problems. The relevant GCC warnings have all disappeared
> indicating that the aliasing is now compliant.

You should be aware that gcc has historically been quite poor at generating 
strict-aliasing violation warnings.  Just because it doesn't warn doesn't 
mean there aren't any problems.  Maybe one of those static_cast<void*>() are 
leading to problems?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkv2hWcACgkQ5vihyNWuA4XIFQCg6qYzcmRL7PCuw410UH0D0KEe
AgEAniMqksd0tZ24pkUX2PLRRHGqAtaj
=uPgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----