Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] memory layout of fusion::vector vs boost::tuple/boost::array
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-13 23:55:14

Next message: Ryan McConnehey: "[Boost-users] Determine 32 vs 64 architecture"
Previous message: Vitaly Budovski: "[Boost-users] [Boost.Spirit] Synthesised attributes and sub-rules"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] memory layout of fusion::vector vs boost::tuple/boost::array"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] memory layout of fusion::vector vs boost::tuple/boost::array"

On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> AMDG
>
> On 10/9/2010 7:42 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yep. We need fusion to have two algorithms: copy and copy_if.
>> Any takers? Should be easy.
>
> I have an implementation of copy somewhere, if I can find it.

Hence, copy...if.

;-)
>

Next message: Ryan McConnehey: "[Boost-users] Determine 32 vs 64 architecture"
Previous message: Vitaly Budovski: "[Boost-users] [Boost.Spirit] Synthesised attributes and sub-rules"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] memory layout of fusion::vector vs boost::tuple/boost::array"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] memory layout of fusion::vector vs boost::tuple/boost::array"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net