Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-04 18:33:13

on Tue Oct 04 2011, Krzysztof Żelechowski <giecrilj-AT-stegny.2a.pl> wrote:

> I can think of a counterexample, but I'm getting tired of
>> arguing about it.  I don't think this is really relevant to the
>> discussion in the end, is it?
>
> I understand that you may be tired of my questions, and I appreciate your 
> answering them :-)  Thank you very much anyway.

To clarify: I'm not tired of your questions; I'm tired of arguing about
whether singularity is dependent on type.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com