Re: [Boost-users] Recommended mock framework to use with Boost?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Recommended mock framework to use with Boost?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-15 12:45:45

<snip>

on Thu Jan 19 2012, Mathieu Champlon <mathieu.champlon-AT-masagroup.net> wrote:

> As for the state of both libraries today, I would say the HippoMocks
> documentation is a bit sparse and the user/reference manual is
> lacking, but the tutorial might be enough to get users started.
> I believe Turtle has a slightly better integration with Boost.Test, is
> a bit more customizable (error policy, constraint logging, ...) and
> seems a more user friendly with compilation errors.
> Also Hippomocks doesn't seem to have been updated later than Dec 2010
> but it might be that it's stable enough (although the git repository
> contains interesting unreleased features I haven't been able to make
> work, such as mocking a free function).
>
> I hope this helps,

Thanks for this very complete rundown!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com