Re: [Boost-users] [boost][review][qvm] QVM formal review result

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost][review][qvm] QVM formal review result
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-04 14:39:10

Adam, thank you very much for running the review process, and thanks
everyone for reviewing and participating in the discussion. Happy new year!

Emil

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Dear Boost community,
>
> The review period for Emil Dotchevski's QVM library has concluded. I'd
> like to thank everyone who participated in the discussions, esspecially
> those who sent formal reviews.
>
> Only four votes were casted however more people commented on issues on the
> mailing list. Comments received during the course of the review were
> generally positive, with a number of technical issues identified that need
> to be addressed. The review identified no fundamental problems in the
> design or implementation of the library that would entail rejection. The
> final version of the library can be fully accepted once Emil has addressed
> the issues identified during the review. Therefore I'm happy to say:
>
>      Emil Dotchevski's Boost.QVM library is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED.
>
> Full report can be found here:
> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2016/01/227027.php
>
> Regards,
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users