Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Boost][Container] Why is flat_set default constructor explicit?
From: Ion GaztaÃ±aga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-17 21:59:48

Next message: Easior Lars: "[Boost-users] Is there a C++ implementation for numerical quadrature/cubature?"
Previous message: Marian Klymov: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 4"
In reply to: dariomt_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-users] [Boost][Container] Why is flat_set default constructor explicit?"

On 17/08/2017 17:02, dariomt--- via Boost-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found out that all Boost.Container default constructors are
> implicit (just as I would expect) except for flat_set.

It's a bug introduced when a single constructor with default arguments
was split in multiple constructors. Fixed in:

https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/863b6e0d3246a1db225675710c34adf45e63de3f

Many thanks.

Ion

Next message: Easior Lars: "[Boost-users] Is there a C++ implementation for numerical quadrature/cubature?"
Previous message: Marian Klymov: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 4"
In reply to: dariomt_at_[hidden]: "[Boost-users] [Boost][Container] Why is flat_set default constructor explicit?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net