Re: [Boost-users] Fit review

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Fit review
From: P F (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-09 21:59:32

> On Sep 9, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Andrea Bocci <andrea.bocci_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> maybe it's too late, but I hadn't seen this library before on the boost-users list.
> 
> Would you consider a different name ?

I have been considering using the name HigherOrderFunctions(or HOF for short), which seems better to describe the library.

> In the context of mathematical and statistical analysis, a "fit" is something else entirely - still related to "functions".
> 
> Reading that "Fit is a header-only ... library that provides utilities for functions..." I was expecting something quite different ;-)

Ah good point.

> 
> Anyway, good job with library itself.

Thanks!