Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Compiling boost with optional _GLIBCXX_DEBUG support
From: Jayesh Badwaik (public_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 08:44:22

Next message: Markus Bonk: "[Boost-users] boost::interprocess::managed_mapped_file filename"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "[Boost-users] [review] The review period of Boost.DoubleEnded has ended -- thanks to all involved"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] Compiling boost with optional _GLIBCXX_DEBUG support"

On Friday, 6 October 2017 19:06:17 CEST John Maddock via Boost-users
wrote:
> I don't believe it's actually possible to support both options - as I
> understand it, whether the option is set or not changes the std lib
> ABI, so it's a whole program thing - everything with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
> or everything without it.

Thank you. I was curious as to how libstdc++ did this without having to
recompile it, but then I realized it has different ABI for different
options.

-- 
Cheers
Jayesh Badwaik
https://www.jayeshbadwaik.in

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part.

Next message: Markus Bonk: "[Boost-users] boost::interprocess::managed_mapped_file filename"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "[Boost-users] [review] The review period of Boost.DoubleEnded has ended -- thanks to all involved"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] Compiling boost with optional _GLIBCXX_DEBUG support"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net