Does that mean 1_34_0 passs all the tests on msvc-8, or just that the report is inacurate for msvc-8?<br><br>Thanks,<br>-Zach<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/11/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Abrahams</b>
 &lt;<a href="mailto:dave@boost-consulting.com">dave@boost-consulting.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&lt;<a href="mailto:james.jones@firstinvestors.com">james.jones@firstinvestors.com</a>&gt; writes:<br><br>&gt; Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?<br><br>Nope.&nbsp;&nbsp;We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the
<br>progress here:<br><a href="http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/issues.html">http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/issues.html</a><br>(regressions are red squares).&nbsp;&nbsp;Note however that the msvc-8 failures
<br>are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.<br><br>--<br>Dave Abrahams<br>Boost Consulting<br><a href="http://www.boost-consulting.com">www.boost-consulting.com</a><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Boost-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Boost-users@lists.boost.org">Boost-users@lists.boost.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users">http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>