I can be patient :). I just wanted to air my grievances and hope that someone who knows what they're doing would clean things up. I'm glad it's already being worked on. I'd be happy to comment on the alpha version whenever it's published. I couldn't say much about correctness of content, of course, but I can check grammar, links, and clarity.

Thanks!
James Hamlin

On 8/2/07, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff@gmail.com> wrote:

"Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8t445$3ho$1@sea.gmane.org...
>
>> "James Hamlin" < jfhamlin@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dd89626a0707311246h7a117da8kd9c392b3b2cb9f2d@mail.gmail.com...
>>Hi,
>>
>>I've begun using Boost.Test to construct test suites for a project, and it
>>looks like it does a great job and is full of nice features (I really like
>>the auto unit tests). >But I have a big complaint: the documentation is
>>pretty poor.
>
> Just a bit more paitient guys ;))
>
> I should be able to publish an alpha version of new completely reworked
> BoostBook Based documnetation for the Boost.Test in a couple days. I will
> really appritiate              read through it and let me know if is there
> any

I meant to say: "If you" here ^


> problems (from any standpoint: english, content, missing link, incorrect
> link etc)
>
> Regards
>
> Gennadiy



_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users