Well thanks guys for everything. I guess I don't need boost at all in this case after all.
"Robert Dailey" <rcdailey@gmail.com > writes:
> I can't really agree or disagree, as my information comes from an article I
> read a long time ago. It stated that the portable way to assign NULL to a
> pointer is to first cast it to the type of the lvalue.
>> class foo {};No, that's guaranteed to work. Either the article you read was wrong,
> foo* myfoo = 0;
or you misinterpreted it.
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Gandhi
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users