On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:59:42 -0500, Scott McMurray wrote:Either way, auto_ptr is the right choice. Thanks.
> On 26/01/2008, Sohail Somani <sohail@taggedtype.net> wrote:
>> Only thing you'd have to be careful of is copying of class C but you
>> can inherit from boost::noncopyable to avoid any issues.
>>
> Using auto_ptr instead of shared_ptr would be another option, if you
> prefer ownership transfer semantics.
You caught me blindly copying!
> Note also that a member function pointer is not usable on its own, so
> you'll need to do something like this instead:
>
> thread.reset(new thread( bind(&C::ThreadJob, this) ));
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users