AMDG
Robert Dailey wrote:
>
>
>
> You can construct a boost::function at the call site explicitly rather
> than relying on the implicit conversion.
>
> Alternately you can provide an overload of Subscribe for function
> pointers.
>
>
> That kind of defeats the purpose. I'm trying to make Subscribe figure
> out the type of the packet itself to avoid having to explicitly say
> "I'm subscribing for a WalkPacket" when the signature of the slot
> already has this information. The current implementation requires this
> syntax:
>
> Subscribe<WalkPacket>( &walkPacketCallback );
If you only need to deal with function pointers,
template<class T>
void Subscribe(void (*callback)(const packet_t&)) {
Subscribe(boost::function<void(const packet_t&)>(callback));