ok, I understand now. Indeed, "variadic" was misleading.
Thanks for your help.
AMDG
Just take the numbers off of the functions at_key1 and at_key2, so that
Istvan Buki wrote:
> thank you very much for your nice and clean solution.
> May I ask you to post the variadic version as it is, even if it
> doesn't compile. I'll try to find how to make it work. It will give me
> a good starting point to learn more about these techniques.
they are overloaded.
I suppose that variadic is not really the right term for this...
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users