ok, I understand now. Indeed, "variadic" was misleading.

Thanks for your help.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG

Istvan Buki wrote:
> thank you very much for your nice and clean solution.
> May I ask you to post the variadic version as it is, even if it
> doesn't compile. I'll try to find how to make it work. It will give me
> a good starting point to learn more about these techniques.

Just take the numbers off of the functions at_key1 and at_key2, so that
they are overloaded.
I suppose that variadic is not really the right term for this...

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users