Hi,<br><br>on my system (RHEL3, libc 2.3.2, gcc 3.2.3, Intel 10.1 which is used to compile and link) real_p fails to parse real numbers like 1.0E-001 and it is most likely the negative exponent as 1.0E001 works as expected.<br>
Our investigations brought us to numerics.hpp line 162 where the int parser which is used by real_p is declared as &#39;int_parser&lt;T, 10, 1, -1&gt;&#39; with T=double. I don&#39;t see the reason for this yet and<br>the &#39;out of the box&#39; int parser &#39;int_p&#39; itself is declared using &#39;int_parser&lt;int&gt;&#39;.<br>
<br>Here my questions:<br>Do I have to expect any problems using int instead double for the real_p exp_n parser?<br>Is this a kind of a mistake as even int_p is declared using &#39;int&#39;?<br><br>Thank you very much for your support,<br>
Jan.<br><br>p.s.: Yes, I know gcc 3.2.3 isn&#39;t officially supported by boost but please consider helping me even so, thanks.<br><br>