<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Roman Perepelitsa <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com">roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/12 Robert Jones <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:robertgbjones@gmail.com" target="_blank">robertgbjones@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><div class="im"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<div class="gmail_quote"><div>That seems at odds with &#39;best of breed&#39; ideologies.<br></div></div></blockquote></div></div><br><div>Can you elaborate on this? I&#39;m sure I&#39;m wrong, but for me it sounds like &quot;if I&#39;m different, I&#39;m better&quot;.</div>
</blockquote></div><br>Hi Roman<br><br>Yes, I know, and that&#39;s more than a little of the problem. It&#39;s not always me tho&#39;, sometimes<br>it&#39;s someone else who, frankly, is better, does know a little more, does have a more informed<br>
perspective, and when I find myself in their company my hope is that I can learn from them, and<br>that they will be ready to teach. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don&#39;t.<br><br>More importantly tho&#39;, is to disassociate the message from the messenger. The only question<br>
that counts is whether there is merit in the techniques and methods being suggested.<br><br>IIRC correctly you have kindly answered some of techincal questions in the past.<br><br>Regards, Rob.<br><br>