bsing escribió: > My previous mail got truncated, the completed listing is below:
Because you are inserting a value which is inalready inserted in an intrusive container. See Documentation:
Yes I figured it out immediately after posting. I tried fixing it by adding a duplicate instance in the vector before adding it to the tree, but the trouble with that seems to be that push_back()s that cause resize()s make the object invalid. So I guess a list is a better structure to hold objects for the lifetime of the avltree?