No, but eventually I will be accessing the shared_ptrs from
different threads.
-David
From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org
[mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of richard.carless@uk.bnpparibas.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:22 AM
To: boost-users@lists.boost.org
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] shared_ptr question
are you running
these functions on different threads?
|
Internet
Sent by:
boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org 18/05/2010
05:00
|
|
Hello,
I am learning shared_ptrs and I am running into a segfault. I'm fairly
certain it's because of some misunderstanding I have.
Here is some code. I have altered it to just so the relevant data:
---- START CODE ----
std::deque<boost::shared_ptr<Frame> > processing_queue ;
void this_is_called() {
boost::shared_ptr<Frame> rx ;
interface->open( "eth0" ) ;
while( running ) {
interface->rx_frame( this->processing_queue ) ;
if( !processing_queue.empty( ) ) {
rx = processing_queue.back( ) ;
if( rx ) {
std::cout
<< "Received Frame of
Ethertype "
<< ntohs( rx->get_ether_header(
).ether_type )
<< "." << std::endl
;
}
}
}
}
}
// rx frame from interface and add onto processing_queue
boost::shared_ptr<Frame> last_rx_frame ; // (CLASSXX member)
void CLASSXX::rx_frame( std::deque<boost::shared_ptr<Frame>
>&
processing_queue ) {
// Do some stuff to receive frame.. (int size= # bytes in frame)
last_rx_frame.reset(new Frame( )) ;
last_rx_frame->bytes.reset( new u_char[size]) ;
memcpy( last_rx_frame->bytes.get(), frame_bytes, size) ;
last_rx_frame->size = size ;
processing_queue.push_back( this->last_rx_frame ) ;
}
---- END CODE ----
The program receives one frame and successful and outputs it:
Received Frame of Ethertype 0x800.
But the second time when it gets to 'rx = processing_queue.back( ) ;' I
have
a segfault.
My understanding of shared_ptrs is that when this assignment is done rx
will
have its ref count decremented (possibly leading to it being deleted). The
back of the processing_queue will then become rx do to the assignment and
that shared ptrs reference count will be increased by one. Anyone know what
my misconception is? Any idea what's causing the segfault?
Thanks!
-David
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users