On 16 September 2010 01:56, Robert Ramey
<ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Indeed - any many have traveled this path. And, as I understand it
some success in specific cases. This has been done by tweaking
the xml_archive class or deriving from the current one. So for
those cases it's an option. Of course, personally I'm more interested in a
more general solution.
Yes, of course, and it's already a nicer than most ways in which XML configuration is written or read, so I will definitely continue to use it. If you would be able to point me to some of those success cases, I would be obliged.
Thanks for all the work, Robert!
Anne