I think what you guys are saying is true. I guess there really isn't a need for another library in the Boost ecosystem. Thank you all for looking at it, however.
> However, I notice that even though Asio works wonderfully for larger,Take a look at these examples:
> asynchronous projects, it gets in the way while doing smaller, more routine tasks.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/doc/html/boost_asio/example/iostreams/daytime_server.cpp
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/doc/html/boost_asio/example/iostreams/daytime_client.cpp
What exactly? IMHO, asio is pretty modular, so you include and compile
> And, asio also is not a miniscule library and when creating binaries,
> one is often including things he/she wouldn't need.
just what you want. Eg, if you don't include the ssl part or timers -
you don't have them in your binary.
Could you please elaborate a bit on how it's different from the ASIO
> So, I wrote a small library (<500 LOC) that basically lets you pretend that a socket is a stream
> and you can use it like std::cout and std::cin.
tcp::iostream?
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users