On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
On 4/6/2011 5:12 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
> You could very well make the case that, indeed, nothing but
> subnamespaces should be in boost.

I'm not making that case, exactly. I'm saying that boost::function
should actually be defined in boost::function_adl_block and be imported
into the boost namespace with a using declaration.


Forgiver my ignorance here, but if you do that which namespaces are then
considered for ADL? boost, boost::function_adl_block or both?

Thx

- Rob.