I'm not sure how restrictive this would be for you but perhaps you could try statically linking the runtime and mfc libraries rather than dynamically linking them?
Den 27-04-2011 08:18, Daniel Bradburn skrev:No, I link dynamically to MFC and the C runtime. I use Visual Studio 2008 with SP1, and Boost version 1.45.0 (but tss_pe.cpp has not changed in 1.46.1 it appears).
If you are linking boost thread statically, are you also linking MFC
and the C runtime statically?
Best regards,
Christian
2011/4/26 Christian Larsen <contact@dword.dk <mailto:contact@dword.dk>>Boost-users@lists.boost.org <mailto:Boost-users@lists.boost.org>
Hello,
I know this has been asked before, but I could not find a good
solution. I'm experiencing problems with an application using both
MFC and Boost.Thread. Specifically the assertion
ASSERT(AfxGetModuleState() != AfxGetAppModuleState());
in AfxCoreInitModule() fails. I link Boost.Thread statically into
a DLL in my project.
>From previous posts to this list and elsewhere, e.g.
http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2009/04/46929.php, I see that
the issue is caused by setting _pRawDllMain in tss_pe.cpp.
Commenting this line does "solve" the problem, but I would rather
not have to hack the Boost source code this way.
It seems there is a patch somewhere for this problem (referred to
in http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2009/04/47015.php), but it
appears it never made it into the source. Is there any chance of
this issue being solved in a better way?
Best regards,
Christian Larsen
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users