<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:Viatcheslav.Sysoltsev@h-d-gmbh.de" target="_blank">Viatcheslav.Sysoltsev@h-d-gmbh.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Yeah, and I would like to fine override some libc functions for just some classes: maybe all boost functions should have all possible libc function pointers as optional parameters? Just accept you&#39;re trying to do something unordinary, which is not worthy to support generally. IMO of course. Try to implement what you need through compiler support or some cunny compiler/linker tricks.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>For being rational, Boost Pool Allocator is being provided by Boost. So do you mean to say that a person using the Boost Pool allocator should refrain from using other Boost libraries and declare that he is doing something &#39;unordinary&#39;. All it takes to implement the allocator support in most cases is a typedef. I can&#39;t understand the reasoning behind your argument.�</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div></div>