Hi,
The purpose of this email is to get some insight on the problem we faced when trying to compile chrono from the 1.47 Beta 1 package. I have tried both the latest released compiler (2011 Update 4) and the current SP1 beta. There is no issue with VS 2010 SP1's compiler.
It was first surfaced here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.user/68421. The error received can be seen below:
< snip >
chrono.cpp
.\boost/chrono/duration.hpp(94): error: expected an expression
&& (boost::is_convertible<Rep2,
^
.\boost/chrono/duration.hpp(124): error: expected an expression
&& (boost::is_convertible<Rep,
^
< snip >
After some discussion with Vicente and some testing by me, it turns out that Intel was not happy with the first operand of the && operator in the following snippet of code:
template <class Duration, class Rep2,
bool = (
(boost::is_convertible<typename Duration::rep,
typename common_type<typename Duration::rep, Rep2>::type>::value)
&& (boost::is_convertible<Rep2,
typename common_type<typename Duration::rep, Rep2>::type>::value)
)
>
struct duration_divide_imp
{
};
If we place an additional parenthesis around that first operand like this:
template <class Duration, class Rep2,
bool = (
( (boost::is_convertible<typename Duration::rep,
typename common_type<typename Duration::rep, Rep2>::type>::value) )
&& (boost::is_convertible<Rep2,
typename common_type<typename Duration::rep, Rep2>::type>::value)
)
>
struct duration_divide_imp
{
};
It will happily compile. It is rather bizarre that this is necessary, which leads Vicente and I to believe that there is a bug in the Intel Compiler. What do you guys think? I have also posted to the Intel forums, the thread can be seen here: http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=84061
Regards,
Edward