Paul Harris wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 09:09, Robert Ramey
<ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
> The ONLY reason I need to use the portable binary archive, is
because
> the usual binary archive's header is incompatible between 32 and
64
> bit. And potentially version number integers and
>
number-of-elements-in-an-array integers and other such overhead
>
stuff.
well of course that's the only reason. binary
archive can just stream
all the bits. to be portable, each element
must be considered for
endianness at a minimum.
One could possible make this faster, but I doubt
that it would
be worth the effort.
Robert Ramey
> your thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing
list
> Boost-users@lists.boost.org
>
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users