On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, James Mathiesen <james-mathiesen@pobox.com> wrote:
This use case seems really common and I was surprised it gave me problems.

I assume that nullptr_t in C++11 fixes this but then I was wondering
if the cases were basic and common enough it would make sense to have
a BOOST_CHECK_NULL / BOOST_CHECK_NOT_NULL and the assorted variants.

Use "0" instead of NULL.

--
Chris Cleeland