<div dir="ltr">ATLR is LL as well</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Mathias Gaunard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org" target="_blank">mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 27/05/13 20:06, Olivier Austina wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> Hi,<br> <br> I would like to choose a parser.<br> <br> I would like to use a parser for text processing (natural language<br> text). Which parser is suited in this case. In general which are the<br> benefit to use boost spirit instead of ANTLR or ANTLR instead of boost<br> spirit. Thank you.<br> </blockquote> <br></div></div> ANTLR is LR, Spirit is LL.<br> Spirit is embedded in C++, ANTLR is a separate preprocessor.<br> <br> Spirit is slow to compile and isn't very efficient at runtime, but it's fairly nice to use once you get used to it.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br> ______________________________<u></u>_________________<br> Boost-users mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Boost-users@lists.boost.org" target="_blank">Boost-users@lists.boost.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users" target="_blank">http://lists.boost.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-<u></u>users</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>SDM </div>