Your fix pass all my personnal tests.
Thanks.
Sorry for the trouble, according to the limit close to zero.
Bye the way do you know when 1_55 version will be publicly
available?
Jean-Eric
Le 18/10/2013 11:01, John Maddock a écrit :
1) in your patch for T operator()() part,
what's the "n" variable, looking at 1_54_0 version there is no
mention to this variable.
There are no changes to operator()(), the n variable appears in
the next part of the diff in
inline T sph_bessel_j_imp(unsigned n, T x, const Policy& pol)
2) is there a way to get your current
version of the bessel.hpp file ?
Attached.
Note I had to change the previous fix somewhat as it failed for
types with extended exponent ranges (I realised that just as I was
dozing off to sleep last night!)
That's true that for x close to zero but
positive there are also problems to the use of power series
close to 0 is certainly the best thing to do. I am astonished
that this not yet used.
Sorry I don't understand: the problem was occurring inside the
power series for small x.
John.
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users