On 30 January 2014 10:41, Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com> wrote:
> you really don't want to use boost::nullptr,
> given that nullptr is a keyword in C++11.

boost::none might be a candidate for this.

Make sure it doesn't interfere with optional< shared_ptr<T> >.  The std::optional proposal chose not to use nullptr for good reason.  That proposal is at <http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2013/n3793.html>.

IMO, it isn't worth this C++03-only change to shared_ptr just to occasionally save some typing.
--
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com>  (847) 691-1404