El 20/02/2014 11:42, Patrick Steele escribió:Nothing has changed AFAIK. shared_memory_object is a memory mapped file whereas windows_shared_memory is backed by the pagefile. I don't know why Windows should make one faster than the other, though.
Hi,
can anyone tell me if there is a performance or other difference between
boost::interprocess::shared_memory_object and
boost::interprocess::windows_shared_memory? With the version of boost we
were using back in 2011 ( boost 1.48 ), we found that
windows_shared_memory operated faster than shared_memory_object when
transporting around 10MB of data. Is this still the case?
Thanks,
Best,
Ion
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users