yes, shared_mutex. thank lgor R.<br><br>Igor R &lt;<a href="mailto:boost.lists@gmail.com">boost.lists@gmail.com</a>&gt;于2014年4月9日星期三写道：<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
&gt; did shared_lock has a member like visual c++ critical_section&#39;s owner? i use<br>
&gt; shared_lock in a game server,<br>
&gt; it has several hundred threads. if has owner, it more easy resolve deadlock.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I guess you mean shared_mutex. No, it doesn&#39;t propagate such an<br>
information to its interface.<br>
<br>
(If your server is network-oriented, it&#39;s worth re-designing it to<br>
take an advantage of the Proactor pattern (using Boost.Asio) -- this<br>
way you&#39;ll get rid of most of these hundreds of threads, and most of<br>
those (unnecessary) multithreading issues will disappear.)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Boost-users mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;Boost-users@lists.boost.org&#39;)">Boost-users@lists.boost.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users" target="_blank">http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users</a><br>
</blockquote>