The problem seems to be the combination of -fgnu-tm and any -O flag.
It doesn't compile for -O1 or -O2, as well. -O0 works. Can you confirm
that? Has anybody ever experienced this before and knows a workaround?
Maybe I should open a bug report.
On 07/15/2014 11:47 PM, Angelo Mondaini wrote:
I also use Archlinux, I have tested your code.2014-07-15 12:09 GMT-03:00 Philipp Schoppe <philipp.schoppe@cern.ch <mailto:philipp.schoppe@cern.ch>>:
Indeed, with all the flags you are trying, gcc can't compile.
To me, the problem is the flag "-O3", removing it gcc can compile the code, no problem.
Note that "-O3" are very wild optimizations, it can makes the code slower some times and it can even break the code.
Careful when using it.
HTH,
Angelo
Boost-users@lists.boost.org <mailto:Boost-users@lists.boost.org>
Hello,
I try to benchmark different queue implementations. I have a test
program
which includes the boost lockfree queue and some custom
implementations
where one is using gcc's STM. In order to compile it, I need to
add the -fgnu-tm
flag. I am using an up-to-date arch linux system with gcc 4.9.0
and boost 1.55.0
When adding this flag, I get a compilation error. This is a small
example that
illustrates the problem:
errtest.cpp:
#include <boost/lockfree/queue.hpp>
int main () {
boost::lockfree::queue<int> lfqueue;
lfqueue.push(234);
return 0;
}
Compiling it using
g++ -std=c++11 -lboost_system -g -O3 -Wall -Werror -Wswitch-enum
-fgnu-tm errtest.cpp -o test
leads to an error.
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users