Yeah, this would be preferable. Alas, I don't have time for that kind of change. But I guess I'll just have to take that bullet.

Thanks,
Stephan

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Bjorn Reese <breese@mail1.stofanet.dk> wrote:
On 09/30/2014 11:24 AM, Stephan Menzel wrote:

So the question is: How can I more or less gracefully shut this down?
How do interruption points work in an omp parallel for loop? Do I have a
chance at all?

One approach is to execute the tasks in a separate process. The process
can easily be killed, and it takes care of the memory leaks.

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users