Hi JB,

JB wrote:
I just read the header files on the two different version of boost and I think I answered my own question.  The equivalent functionality was essentially renamed element_type.  I'd still appreciate confirmation that I got that right.

You're correct, value_type was removed.  As a note, element_type was always the correct typedef to access (value_type was undocumented).  I was bit by that myself in a couple places.

HTH,
Nate