Is anyone using the parallel BGL? The following code gives me a segmentation fault for the parallel case but I can’t figure out what can be wrong. You can replace PetscInitialize and PetscFinalize with the respective standard MPI calls.

Regards,
Alessio Quaglino


#define PARALLEL_GRAPH

using namespace boost;
using boost::graph::distributed::mpi_process_group;

typedef adjacency_list <vecS, vecS, undirectedS> SerialGraph;
typedef adjacency_list<vecS, distributedS<mpi_process_group, vecS>, undirectedS> Graph;
typedef iterator_property_map<std::vector<int>::iterator, property_map<Graph, vertex_index_t>::type> LocalMap;

static char help[] = "";

int main(int argc,char **args)
{
    PetscErrorCode ierr;
PetscInitialize(&argc,&args,(char*)0,help);

    

    int nV = 40000;
    int num = 0;

    

#ifdef PARALLEL_GRAPH
    Graph G(nV+1);
    synchronize(G);
    std::vector<int> localComponent(nV+1);
    LocalMap components(localComponent.begin(),get(vertex_index, G));
    num = connected_components_ps(G, components);
#else
    SerialGraph G(nV+1);
    std::vector<int> globalComponent(nV+1);
    num = connected_components(G, &globalComponent[0]);
#endif

    

    std::cout << num << " connected components" << std::endl;

    

ierr = PetscFinalize();
return 0;
}